Will Political Class, Mainstream Media Tell it Like it is About Trump?

The final outcome of the 2016 election might well depend on whether the charter members of our media elite are willing to trust their lying eyes and call ‘em like they see ‘em.

It’s no secret that the so-called “mainstream media” views itself as the impartial arbiter between two equally-responsible political parties who advance familiar agendas and vie for power at regular two-year intervals. The media are content in this role because it means equal access to the corridors of power as incumbents and challengers alike court the press for favorable coverage.

And so long ago, before even the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency was unthinkable, I wrote that it was wrong to talk about the "liberal bias" of the media because America's media establishment was conservative in the same way all establishments are conservative -- defending a status quo that's worked out pretty well for them.

Flash forward five years and the people who will be telling the story of the 2016 election are those who have risen to the top of their professions - to positions of power, prestige and profit - because they have mastered the rituals and assumptions of a two-party political "system" in which functioning and legitimate Democratic and Republican parties are the central "givens" that support all of the other familiar routines our elites think they know so well.

There is therefore powerful inertia and self-interest driving our political class to protect those "givens" from scrutiny or criticism, even when one of our major parties jumps the rails and nominates as its standard-bearer someone as utterly unfit as Donald Trump.

David Roberts, writing in Vox, is right when he says the window may be closing on that “brief period of clarity” when a bi-partisan consensus exists (outside of Trump’s most rabid supporters) that Trump is not fit to be president.

It’s not just Democrats who think so.  As Roberts points out, Republicans and conservatives are leading the way in the race to invent the most imaginative invectives with which to hurl against this self-proclaimed tribune of the people.

Marco Rubio called Trump a “con man.”  Mitt Romney called him “a phony, a fraud.”  Ted Cruz called him an “amoral pathological liar” who could plunge the county into an “abyss."  Lindsey Graham said Trump would lead to “another 9/11.”  David Brooks called him “epically unprepared to be president.” 

George Will said that Trump’s running mate will, by accepting Trump’s offer, automatically identify himself or herself as being unqualified for high office. The National Review devoted an entire issue to condemning Trump in “florid terms.”  A Super PAC was created just to stop him.

My personal favorite was New York Times conservative Ross Douthat who was so incensed by the thought this madman may be one step from the White House he used “grotesque” as a noun when he fumed that Trump was a “proto-fascist grotesque with zero political experience and poor impulse control.”

The issue is not really ideological, says Roberts.  The attacks against Trump are not about taxes, or regulation or whether the Mexican government will build us a wall at its own expense to keep its citizens from visiting America.  It’s about basic fitness and competence, says Roberts, and the genuine fear that “a man with Trump's temperament and habits could do real, lasting, no-joke damage as the leader of the free world.”

Say what you want about Hillary Clinton, says Roberts, but for all her flaws she is at least a serious person who understands how policy and government work and is manifestly more prepared to run the federal government than Donald Trump.  She just is.

Yet, as Roberts laments, the number of people who recognize this “elemental fact has probably already reached and passed its peak.”  It is all downhill from here.

Just watch.  Today’s “moment of clarity” will quickly fade as established players try to “normalize” Trump and his vulgarian behavior for the simple reason the American political system is an “ecosystem” in which media, consultants, power brokers, think tanks, foundations, officeholders – “the whole thick network of institutions and individuals involved in national politics” -- cannot deal with a presidential election in which one candidate is so obviously inferior to the other. 

One side is offering “a flawed centrist.”  The other is offering up “a vulgar xenophobic demagogue” – a liar and a racist and an egomaniac.  But these realities run counter to the interests of “entire classes of professionals whose jobs are premised on the model of two roughly equal sides, clashing endlessly,” says Roberts.

Yet, says Roberts, “the machine is simply not built to handle a race that's over before it's begun.”

The blunt criticism of Trump we are now hearing from the media will likely change once Trump formally becomes the Republican nominee, says Roberts, as the entire GOP apparatus falls into line behind him as Republicans accuse journalists of “bias” whenever they write critical stories about him, however accurate they might be. 

As we enter a new phase in the campaign now that Republican and Democratic standard-bearers are pretty much known, let’s see if the media reverts to form and turns a blind eye to the radical changes that have transformed the GOP as well as the ugly base that supports its presumptive nominee. 

Views: 182

Comment by JMac1949 Today on May 10, 2016 at 4:26pm

Trump depends on the media to provide his campaign with free publicity, because he knows that his vitriol sells papers and draws high ratings.  Back in March I posted this:  CBS President Les Moonves Celebrates Donald Trump's Ratings - It's ...


Comment by koshersalaami on May 10, 2016 at 7:16pm
I've said for years that the way the media works, whoever behaves worse gets a free pass to the extent that they behave worse,
Comment by Dandy Lion on May 10, 2016 at 9:24pm

Unfortunately I think that career opportunities and tribalism will see most Republicans rally around the Donald.  I hope I'm wrong but it wouldn't surprise me at all to see the usual media voices shilling for their usual candidates.  I wouldn't want to place a very large bet on Hillary winning it.  I've seen enough comments on enough sites to know that there's a certain voting segment that purports to vote for Trump to spite the hurtful insults launched by the anti-Trumpists.

Then there's the smaller faction who support Stein and maybe Bernie who would rather vote with a clear conscience who are apparently indifferent as to whether Trump or Hillary gets elected.  Some even profess to be unable to distinguish between the two.

Comment by Maui Surfer on May 11, 2016 at 12:08pm

@D L ... indeed as there is a small but dense intersection where the Far Right overlaps the Far Left on the old Venn Diagram.

Comment by Ben Sen on May 17, 2016 at 9:25am

It's all true.  The country has tried celebrity-politicians before, but not on this level.  For the most part they've failed miserably and infamously.  You can rail against the "political class" and Washington all you want, but it doesn't mean you can go around it if in fact this "democracy" has any credibility. 

Yet, as Mark Danner put it in this month's NYRB we could well be one terrorist attack away from a Trump presidency, no matter what the press or anybody else has to say about it.

The battle, as usual, is not with Trump's fanatics since there is nothing that can be done with them, but amongst Democrats, moderates, and true liberals regardless of any other label, who are intent on doing what they can to see to it the alternate is elected in a real world rather than TV.  Attempts to muddle the issue need to be seen as such.

Comment by Ben Sen on May 17, 2016 at 9:32am

"Dandy  Lion's" comment is a perfect example of what I mean.  Rather than taking a stand, an intellectual assessment is provided that avoids the issue:  If you don't want Trump to be president you will need to vote for Hillary.  The rest is flak.  


You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon


Pen for Hire ( Bathos, Pathos)

Posted by J.P. Hart on June 19, 2019 at 11:23am 2 Comments

Always Out Front.... Anyway

Posted by Robert B. James on June 19, 2019 at 8:34am 1 Comment

One Flew Under Radar

Posted by J.P. Hart on June 18, 2019 at 3:15pm 0 Comments

Tolerance and Bigots

Posted by alsoknownas on June 18, 2019 at 2:20pm 6 Comments

Where Jaws was Filmed

Posted by J.P. Hart on June 18, 2019 at 11:19am 3 Comments

I’m Not A Buddhist

Posted by Robert B. James on June 18, 2019 at 7:42am 5 Comments

2 Questions for Kosh and Jon

Posted by Ron Powell on June 18, 2019 at 2:30am 9 Comments

© 2019   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service