White Privelege As Explained in Alternative Facts

Emmett Louis Till (July 25, 1941 – August 28, 1955) was a 14-year-old African-American who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955 after offending a white woman in a grocery store. The brutality of his murder and the fact that his killers were acquitted drew attention to the long history of violent persecution of African Americans in the United States. Till posthumously became an icon of the Civil Rights Movement.

Till was born and raised in Chicago and in August 1955, was visiting relatives near Money, in the Mississippi Deltaregion. He spoke to 21-year-old Carolyn Bryant, the white married proprietor of a small grocery store there. Although what happened at the store is a matter of dispute, Till was accused of flirting with or whistling at Bryant. Years later, Bryant disclosed that, in 1955, she had fabricated testimony that Till made verbal or physical advances towards her in the store.[1][2] Till's reported behavior, perhaps unwittingly, violated the strictures of conduct for an African American male interacting with a white woman in the Jim Crow-era South.[3]Several nights after the store incident, Bryant's husband Roy and his half-brother J. W. Milam went armed to Till's great-uncle's house and abducted the boy. They took him away and beat and mutilated him before shooting him in the head and sinking his body in theTallahatchie River. Three days later, Till's body was discovered and retrieved from the river.

Till's body was returned to Chicago. His mother, who had mostly raised him, insisted on a public funeral service with an open casket to show the world the brutality of the killing. "The open-coffin funeral held by Mamie Till Bradley exposed the world to more than her son Emmett Till's bloated, mutilated body. Her decision focused attention not only on American racism and the barbarism of lynching but also on the limitations and vulnerabilities of American democracy".[4] Tens of thousands attended his funeral or viewed his open casket, and images of his mutilated body were published in black-oriented magazines and newspapers, rallying popular black support and white sympathy across the U.S. Intense scrutiny was brought to bear on the lack of black civil rights in Mississippi, with newspapers around America critical of the state. Although initially local newspapers and law enforcement officials decried the violence against Till and called for justice, they responded to national criticism by defending Mississippians, temporarily giving support to the killers.

In September 1955, Bryant and Milam were acquitted by an all-white jury of Till's kidnapping and murder. Protected against double jeopardy, the two men publicly admitted in a 1956 interview with Look magazine that they had killed Till. In 2004 the case was officially reopened by the United States Department of Justice. The defense team in the 1955 trial had questioned whether the body was that of Till. In 2004, Till's body was exhumed and positively identified. Till's original casket was then donated to the Smithsonian Institution and it is displayed in theNational Museum of African American History and Culture. After Milam and Bryant were acquitted, they initially remained in Mississippi, but were boycotted, threatened, attacked and humiliated by local residents. Milam died in 1980 at the age of 61, and Bryant died in 1994 at the age of 63. Bryant expressed no remorse for his crime and stated: "Emmett Till is dead. I don't know why he just can't stay dead."[5]

The trial of Bryant and Milam received extensive press coverage. Till's murder was seen as a catalyst for the next phase of the Civil Rights Movement. In December 1955, the Montgomery Bus Boycott began in Alabama and lasted more than a year, gaining a US Supreme Court ruling that segregated buses were unconstitutional.

According to historians, events surrounding Emmett Till's life and death continue to resonate. Some writers have suggested that almost every story about Mississippi returns to Till, or the Deltaregion in which he died, in "some spiritual, homing way."[6] An Emmett Till Memorial Commission was established in the early 21st century. The Sumner County Courthouse was restored and includes the Emmett Till Interpretive Center. The Emmett Till Memory Project is a website and smartphone app commemorating his life; fifty-one sites in the Mississippi Delta are associated with Till.


I was born on the 18th of August, 1946, in San Antonio, Texas, where my mother was born and always referred to as "home".

Six months later, we moved to New Haven, Connecticut, the birth place and hometown of my father.

In 1955, the year Emmett Till was murdered, I was 9 years old.

I grew up in Connecticut because my mother didn't want this kind of shit to happen to me.

Views: 229

Comment by Ron Powell on July 31, 2017 at 7:05am

"The 1967 Newark riots were a major civil disturbance that occurred in the city of Newark, New Jersey between July 12 and July 17, 1967. The four days of rioting, looting, and destruction left 26 dead and hundreds injured."


Where were you when this was taking place?

This paints a completely different picture and tells an entirely different story.


Comment by Ron Powell on July 31, 2017 at 7:17am

I don't understand how you and your family could miss this.

And, , go about your business without any concern.

Comment by Safe Bet's Amy on July 31, 2017 at 7:35am

Me thinks that nowadays the people of Newark wouldn't be facing bayonets, but armored police tanks with machine guns mounted on top.  Either that or no one would even notice about a solitary black man being beaten by the police AGAIN.

Comment by Ron Powell on July 31, 2017 at 8:17am

@TM;  During the Civil War, there were people who would come out and sit on the hillsides to watch the battles as they occured as though the whole thing was some kind of entertainmrnt.

You talk of living a few moles away and "border" streets and avenues...

I'll bet you didn't dare venture into the Newark ghettos, the 100% black neighborhoods, where the actual rioting was taking place...

Hell, as a stranger to the location, I wouldn't have gone into the midst of the rioting myself.

You can't "hype" reality...

There were people who thought that the reports of the death of Emmett Till was a bunch of "hype"..

Comment by Ron Powell on July 31, 2017 at 8:30am

Amy, TM's comment may be referred to or characterized as an expression of  denial.

Comment by Ron Powell on July 31, 2017 at 9:32am

I won't disagree that there are 'news' organizations that would sensationalize any and everything.

However, the film speaks for itself.


Just turn the volume down and look at the pictures.

Comment by greenheron on August 1, 2017 at 5:47am

Ron you might be interested in the significant art world broohaha going on as we speak. I mentioned a number a months ago about the white artist Dana Schutz whose painting of Emmett Till caused so much controversy at the Whitney Biennial this year. The Biennial is always controversial, but this year, was the biggest I've seen. There was a great protest demanding its removal, by artists, art professionals, as well as general public. One artist got a lot of coverage for standing in front of the painting all day blocking it from view. Things got wild.

So now, the artist is having an exhibit at the ICA in Boston, and we've made the national news with another large scale protest, before the exhibit even opened, demanding that it close, even though the Emmett Till painting isn't included. It's been an interesting experience for me, in that I can completely see both sides of the debate. Maybe you remember my experience with my black art professor who told me I wasn't allowed to paint black people and that I took that to heart. 

Here is a good article that pretty well sums up the state of the situation.

Comment by Ron Powell on August 1, 2017 at 7:56am

Greenie,  thanks for the contribution and the link...

However, it must be said that neither you or TM are reacting to the "statement" I'm making with this post. But,  rather using it as an opportunity to make tangentially related statements of your own.

Not a problem, but worth noting...

Evasion? Avoidance? Denial?

There's a direct relationship between the film clips which are based on artistic works of fiction and the Wikipedia item which is factual.

It seems that no one here wishes to address it as presented.

In my view,  a very telling development.

Comment by Safe Bet's Amy on August 1, 2017 at 8:03am

Okay, you lost me with that last comment, Ron.

Are you saying that moving solved nothing because racism is systemic and not limited to "southern bigots"?  Agreed.  Are you saying that it affected you greatly because you were a young black man, of similar age?  Understandable.

Beyond those two choices, I'm not getting what you are trying to share.

Comment by greenheron on August 1, 2017 at 8:27am

Ron, you know exactly where I stand on this. I’d only be repeating myself. It is not a matter of denial, you know that too. I’ve been swamped the past few days, and haven’t been here or had  time to write long comments that require tending. It’s always the same people saying the same thing anyway. But I thought you might be interested in the Emmet Till issue as it has recently reared up in the art establishment, as tangential to this post. I thought about making a post myself, but didn’t have time.

Have to get back to work, so much to finish by the weekend. Carry on :)


You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon


Trump trusts his gut

Posted by Dicky Neely on July 21, 2018 at 2:11pm 0 Comments

Apartheid Version 2.0

Posted by Safe Bet's Amy on July 21, 2018 at 7:32am 4 Comments

Dreaming at My Age

Posted by Ben Sen on July 20, 2018 at 7:00pm 0 Comments


Posted by Ben Sen on July 20, 2018 at 11:14am 2 Comments

Off With His Head!!!!!

Posted by Safe Bet's Amy on July 20, 2018 at 7:03am 11 Comments

© 2018   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service