I’ve been blogging on another site lately because I was looking for a place with some activity and someone I know here told me he was also there. It is mostly a luridly conservative site, you know, blaming victims, blaming Jews for everything wrong with the world (on a scale I never saw here), etc. A lot of post titles that sound like Ann Coulter wrote them.
So this morning I decided to respond.
Here’s my post title
“The Republican plan to starve the poor, forbid Blacks from voting, open death camps for gays & Muslims, deport whoever speaks Spanish, raise Earth’s temp 15 degrees, make everyone speak Russian, give the 1% everything, & appoint Trump king”
The entire post was:
“I figured I needed a lurid title to fit in here and I noticed that most of them are from Republicans, so I decided in the interest of balance that my side needed one.”
That’s the whole post.
Here’s how my first commenter started:
“Perhaps your article should contain some substance, to black up your claim?”
It finishes with:
“A headline may be informative to those who do not read, but it is not a substantive article.”
I’m not making this up.
This place may be on life support, but maybe I’m not giving what’s left of it enough credit. At least y’all aren’t drooling on your keyboards.
I never thought a sentence like that would constitute an actual compliment.
Sent from my iPad