Image result for nasty neighbors

Lets say that your neighbors go on vacation, and while they are gone, the government moves a bunch of very aggressive people into their house (totally without the neighbor's permission, btw).

Of course, you and all of your other members of your Homeowner's Association are upset about this happening, but the government who put them there and the very aggressive people promises that they will behave, stop their aggressive actions and be good neighbors to everyone.

You are still concerned about where the neighbors who are on vacation will live when they come back however, so in a meeting with the government and the very aggressive people you express this concern and the very aggressive people swear that the old neighbors most certainly will be allowed back into their house when they return.

Based on these promises of non-aggression and "the right of return" you and the other neighbors accept the new, very aggressive people into your homeowners association. 

The problems arise as soon as the neighbors return.

  • When they tried to go back into their house the very aggressive people started abusing, beating and even killing them and refused to let them in, as they had promised.

  • They then totally ignore each and everyone of the HOA's Rules and Regulations.

  • Lastly, they dig up the shrubs that mark your property line, move them twenty feet into your lawn and then say that new area has always belonged to them and threaten you with a shotgun when you complain.


To make matters worse, several friends of the very aggressive people (and who were part of the government that put them there in the first place) were on the HOA's Board of Directors and made it impossible, via their veto, to even discuss the fact that the very aggressive people had egregiously lied when they made declarations and explanations about allowing the old neighbors back in, agreeing to comply with the HOA rules and would respect everyone's property lines.

In a just scenario, the HOA membership would boot both the very aggressive people AND the corrupt Board members out on their asses at the next Annual Meeting, right?


Now lets go back to a meeting of the United Nations in 1949...

On May 11, 1949, the UN General Assembly passed United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273, which allowed the State of Israel membership in the United Nations.

UN Resolution 273 reads in part:

Recalling its resolutions of 29 November 1947 and 11 December 1948 and taking note of the declarations and explanations made by the representative of the Government of Israel before the Ad Hoc Political Committee in respect of the implementation of the said resolutions,

The General Assembly,

Acting in discharge of its functions under Article 4 of the Charter and rule 125 of its rules of procedure,

1. Decides that Israel is a peace loving State which accepts the obligations contained in the Charter and is able and willing to carry out those obligations;

2. Decides to admit Israel to membership in the United Nations.

Image result for united nations

What were the Declarations and Explanations upon which Israel was conditionally allowed UN membership?

Well one was acceptance of UN General Assembly Resolution 194, which resolved that, regarding the displaced Palestinians:

refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.”

Another was that they would NEVER try to change the status of Jerusalem from EXACTLY as how it was defined and partitioned.

Lastly the partition agreement would define Israel's final borders.

Does anyone actually believe that any of this has occurred?  

Does anyone actually not believe that Israel told the most blatant lies to gain membership into the international community?

SOOOOO, Israel's acceptance was conditional upon their allowing the Palestinians (who actually lived there) the same "Right of Return" that they allow some pimply faced, Jewish kid in Brooklyn, who couldn't find Israel on the freaking map if it were circled in red.

SOOOOO, Israel's acceptance was conditional upon their not jacking around with who could be allowed into Jerusalem and that it specifically was NOT their city.

SOOOOO, Israel's acceptance was conditional upon the specified partition agreement would define their final borders.

Israel has most certainly NOT met these conditions and they have NOT met these conditions for over 70 freaking years!

Image result for united nations

Isn't it WAY past time that the United Nations lived by its motto and booted Israel back out of the world community for ONCE AGAIN breaking their promises (aka lying)?

Image result for united nations

Isn't it WAY past time that the United Nations took away the United State's veto power in the UN Security Council... at least until Trump and his yappy little lap dog Nikki Haley get booted too?

Views: 177

Comment by Ron Powell on May 23, 2018 at 12:36pm

What?! And move UN headquarters to Tel Aviv?

Comment by Robert Wolf on May 24, 2018 at 8:54am

Right on. 

Comment by moki ikom on May 24, 2018 at 11:06am

??? Time to give them the boot?


it's past time; though better late than never

Comment by Barbara Joanne on May 27, 2018 at 2:53am

Israel is not going to commit suicide.  It doesn't matter what the UN does.  It is time for the Palestinian leadership to renounce all promises to annihilate the country, accept its right to exist and work toward a two-state solution - which is what could have been 70 years ago if the poor Palestinians had not had it thrown away by their leaders. Facing the reality of Israel is the most only way forward for the Palestinians and their only hope.

Comment by Safe Bet's Amy on May 27, 2018 at 6:07am

Barbara Joanne, just stop with the hasbara bullshit.

The Palestinian leadership proposed a two state solution and it was immediately rejected by Israel and the only semblance of a two state solution Israel has ever even considered was nothing more than moving one open air prison from the coastline to one in the middle of an arid desert.

Also, the Palestinian leadership has REPEATEDLY acknowledged Israel's right to exist (starting back in 1992, FFS) and it is Israel's leadership who has REPEATEDLY said that there will NEVER be a Palestinian state.

So in other words, EVERYTHING you just said are disproven lies and propaganda, which makes you nothing but an Israeli shill.

P.S.  Before you start your denials, here are some links to prove you wrong...

Palestinians acknowledge Israel's right to exist:

Israel stating there will never be a Palestinian state:


You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon


I’m Not Playing

Posted by Robert B. James on May 23, 2019 at 8:25am 2 Comments

Square Knotted Red Bandanna

Posted by J.P. Hart on May 23, 2019 at 6:02am 9 Comments

© 2019   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service