There will come a time, and that time will arrive sooner than many believe, when Near East Muslims will grasp that Jews—that Israel—is not what holds them back. This is a reason I am (along with every United States president since Mr. Truman) for a two-state solution.

 

The long-term solution will be about secure borders, mutual respect for Islam's and Judaism's historical and holy sites, formal political recognition of Israel by Palestinians, and other issues yet to be negotiated.

 

But it will also be about core cultural and regional issues that Israel cannot influence. With a state to manage, Palestinians will be accountable to more than rhetoric, missiles, bullets, and bombs. They, and the nations who support them, will need to come to terms with some stubborn and uncomfortable problems, none of which can be laid at Israel's door.

 

Ask yourself: Were Israel to be gone in the morning, would poor, Near East Muslims—including Palestinians—genuinely enjoy a new dawn?

 

I offer three points for your consideration:

 

I

 

Religious ideology (any religious ideology) that rejects modernity cannot hope to raise educational standards enough to be competitive and raise living standards for millions. Israel has nothing to do with the grip of medievalism that has retarded much of the Muslim world’s economic development. The irony is that it was not always so in the Near East Muslim world: It was a leader in math, the sciences, engineering, architecture, and other forms of design until about four hundred years ago, when it began to become increasingly reactionary, if not xenophobic, finding it more and more difficult to live with and near non-Muslims. 

 

II

 

No nation—ours, Israel—is without ugly, dismissive, class-based prejudice. Yet, what has to be confronted by poorer Near East Muslims is the back of the hand that wealthy, authoritarian Arab states have continually given to their far poorer regional coreligionists, as evidenced by the many decades of extraordinary and continuing economic disparity between the oil-rich Muslim states and Near East Muslim communities that have not benefited from oil. As far as I can see, nothing external has prevented the geologically fortunate and therefore far more economically robust Islamic states from helping to raise living standards in their much poorer, politically and religiously allied nations and communities. Certainly, Israel has not stopped them.

 

In part, of course, it's been simpler and more useful for the wealthy autocracies to keep the poor ones impoverished in order to use them as a thorn in Israel's side, as ready cannon fodder. It's been easier to point to Israel as the reason the poor countries and communities live as they do. With a concerted effort, the oil states could, if they genuinely cared about Palestinians, raise living and educational standards within a generation. That they fail to do it, I think, has more to do with class and prejudice against the Jews than with Israel's existence or behavior.


 

III.

 

Any culture choosing to suppress half its populationwomencannot expect more than a halting development.

I am reminded of the 2011 Saudi imprisonment of 32-year-old Manal al-Sharif for organizing a protest during which she drove a car. Driving a car is, for women, illegal in the kingdom. So are voting, operating a business, and working without a husband's or father's permission.

Ms. al-Sharif's real crime, though, goes beyond the stick shift. An Internet technologies specialist with oil giant Aramco, she organized her protest on Facebook and Twitter, garnering the names of over 600 men and women who saw the rule for what it is: an absurd shackle not only cuffing women but any nation that would so easily embed female infantilization in religion. In a nation where your name on a petition can swiftly have you disappeared, the 600-plus are to be commended. Initially, Ms. al-Sharif and her brother were both arrested and detained. He was sent home with a warning; she was imprisoned.

The routine suppression of women under law is never an avenue toward long-term societal success. This is true no matter how much oil (or whatever resources) you may have, no matter what your religious beliefs. Certainly not all Near East nations deny women the right to drive a car. In how many, though, may they vote? In how many may they work outside the home without a man's permission? In those countries where women are more independent, general living standards improve.

So while Israel is far from perfect (as all Israelis and American Jews know), it remains important to see and only honest to acknowledge that nothing Israel has done or is doing has led to the longstanding choice in the Muslim Near East to regard women as children, nor to that choice's many consequences.

---

This is a repost, from 2010. I will offer a version of it on PASSIONATE JUSTICE RADIO this coming Saturday. 

Views: 110

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on December 9, 2013 at 7:13am

Thanks for your consideration; I'm aware of the feelings these topics engender. 

Comment by Claudia Darling on December 9, 2013 at 8:42am
That's exactly it, Jonathan: point to "the other", the evil that must be vanquished, the threat from outside, then when it's gone, everything will be paradise. It works here, there, everywhere.
Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on December 9, 2013 at 8:44am

Claudia    sadly, it works too well...as rhetoric...but it does nothing to raise up  people at all.

Comment by Claudia Darling on December 9, 2013 at 8:46am
And that's the sad part, humans reacting with their lizard brains to a threat. No thinking involved at all. The manipulators of power have it honed to a fine art.
Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on December 9, 2013 at 8:51am

uhmhmm   and far too easily manipulated...all of us

Comment by koshersalaami on December 9, 2013 at 9:04am

Actually, the most industrialized part of the Arab world is the West Bank.


I don't think the Arab world blames Israel for their lack of progress so much as they blame Israel for oppressing Palestinians and use that blame as a distraction from their lack of progress. In that respect, some of this case may be a bit of a straw man. How many nations in the Arab world treat women has nothing to do with Israel but, more to the point, I don't think those Arab nations or other observers and allies claim that their treatment of women has anything to do with Israel; they may not even blame the consequences of their mistreatment of women on Israel.

I'm not sure I'd argue that the oil producing nations owe the non-oil producing nations anything. However, the issue this brings into focus is to what extent the oil-rich Arab nations consider other Arab nations their brethren. My main observation about this is that in the Arab world they seem to care far less about who is being oppressed than about who is doing the oppressing. They're not outraged by oppression, they're outraged by Jewish oppression of Muslims. There are plenty of regional examples involving greater oppression and also many of greater killing of Muslims. Darfur is the most extreme of these - in that case, both the killers and the victims are Muslim, though the victims are not Arab. However, that was not true during the Shia/Sunni fighting during the Iraq war and it certainly isn't true in Syria at the moment; both of these cases involve way, way more killing of Arabs than Israel is guilty of. My overall point is that the rich Arab states regard the Palestinians as their brethren to the extent that they are being oppressed by Israelis and only to that extent. There is no evidence that they actually care about Palestinians. For a while, one of the Arab governments, I think it was Saddam Hussein's, offered a hefty reward to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers - in other words, that particular oil-rich Arab nation wasn't interested in paying Palestinians to live but was perfectly willing to pay them to die. That's a pretty cynical definition of brotherhood.


There's a point I have to make because, given the OS/OurS readership, making this point is unfortunately necessary: None of what I'm saying constitutes claims of Israeli innocence. My comment is not about Israeli innocence, it's about Arab cynicism.

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on December 9, 2013 at 9:05am

I don't hold w all you say here, tho it's all challenging and appreciated. 

Comment by Kathy Knechtges on December 9, 2013 at 2:23pm

one can only solve a problem like this when one is willing to look at both sides and see their point of view, as you have done here, one cannot remain a victim forever

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on December 9, 2013 at 2:31pm

Kathy   yes; thank you!

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon

NEW BLOG POSTS

Where Jaws was Filmed

Posted by J.P. Hart on June 18, 2019 at 11:19am 0 Comments

I’m Not A Buddhist

Posted by Robert B. James on June 18, 2019 at 7:42am 1 Comment

2 Questions for Kosh and Jon

Posted by Ron Powell on June 18, 2019 at 2:30am 2 Comments

Greeting of the Day

Posted by Ron Powell on June 16, 2019 at 10:08am 0 Comments

Go Big or Go Home

Posted by Ron Powell on June 16, 2019 at 9:30am 2 Comments

© 2019   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service