It wasn’t a campaign that Texas Senator Ted Cruz launched at Liberty University last week.  It was a crusade, whose radical purpose and unsettling emptiness comes into stark relief when his vision for America is distilled to its essence:

“My father gave his life to Jesus Christ.....our rights don’t come from man….God Almighty……the purpose of the Constitution…..chains to bind the mischief of government……American exceptionalism…..a shining city on a hill.....Give me liberty or give me death…..millions of courageous conservatives rising up together…..unison…..half of born again Christians aren’t voting……millions of people of faith… our values…..government regulators….tax collectors kept at bay.....defend the sanctity of human life.....uphold the sacrament of marriage.....repealing every word of Common Core....stands unapologetically with Israel….honor the Constitution…..defeat radical Islamic it by its name….defend the United States of America.... Ronald Reagan....Cold War….Berlin Wall….grace of God….God’s providential blessing....repealing Obamacare….abolishing the IRS…..stand for liberty....text the word constitution....reclaim the Constitution….. reclaim the mandate.....people of faith....God bless you.”

Like most right wing conservatives, Ted Cruz does not even pretend he would be the President of all the American people. Instead, he would be the chosen representative of just one faction of them.  And so, Cruz chose the perfect venue to begin his crusade: the late Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia.

The Cruz for President announcement was “larded” with the Republican Party’s customary “patriotic fanfare,” “unearned chutzpah,” and “carefully staged, color-coded, gender-designated patriarchal family posing,” says writer and historian Jarret Ruminski in Salon.

As the condensed version of Cruz’s announcement above attests, what is most disturbing about Cruz’s White House run is that it, as Ruminski says, “embodies the modern conservative propensity toward a fundamentalist American civil religion and its attendant, overly simplistic myths.”

To the American conservative subculture that forms the Ted Cruz base, the United States is no longer just a nation but a religion, says Ruminski.  And so Americans are not only God’s chosen people since America itself is now “a divine project.”

Before there can be a union between church and state a precarious fusion between nationalism and faith must first take place.  This “civil religion” is one that, as Ruminski says, “casts the United States as a divine world power shaped by a series of comforting myths that, in the eyes of fervent believers like Cruz, make it the ultimate political Promised Land.”

A civil religion is a set of beliefs, symbols, and rituals that purport to express the shared experience of being American, he says. It's a worldview inspired by Christian notions of redemption and spiritual fulfillment where America is “a beacon of secular and sacred hope in a fallen modern world.”

Moreover, a civil religion is “not a set of laws but a collection of myths,” such as the idea that America is “the last best hope for mankind.” These myths cannot be empirically confirmed.

As a hybrid of nationalism and traditional religion, civil religion has “an ideological flexibility that is intoxicating because it is so evocative, elastic, and deceptively complex,” writes historian Raymond Haberski.

If the concept of America as a divinely inspired Promised Land bent on a mission of world redemption seems open-ended and ripe for abuse, “that’s because it is,” says Ruminski.

Ted Cruz packed his Liberty University speech with the simplistic and historically inaccurate myths that characterize the American conservatives’ approach to civil religion, says Ruminski.  It’s a “steaming pot of moral absolutes, anti-intellectualism and redemptionist history” that burns away all nuance and context and leaves only “a distilled political elixir of fundamentalist dogma that absolves America of any of the human faults that plague other nations.”

Cruz and other conservatives don’t see America as being part of the world “community.”  Indeed, they hate the very term “world community” since they see America “as a nation apart from world history.”

An America defined by a future President Cruz would be one that “sees itself as blindingly perfect, naively innocent, incapable of critical reflection over both its strengths and weaknesses and utterly convinced of its capacity to shape the world in its own image.”

Needless to say, followers of Cruz’s civil religion also see themselves as belonging to a sacred community apart from the rest of their fellow Americans as well, and so utterly convinced of their own righteousness and responsibility to reshape this “godly” nation of ours in their own graven image.

The “clash of civilizations” tearing apart the world today is not between Christianity and “radical” Islam, as is so often advertised.  The war being fought for the hearts and minds of the earth’s inhabitants is over the ultimate victory of one of two competing ways of organizing human societies.

One is modern, secular and liberal and enables peoples of different races, faiths, interests and points-of-view to peacefully co-exist with one another according to universal principles of justice and equality. 

The other is traditional and tribal and seeks political power to achieve the supremacy of a single sub-group or faith whose followers can then reshape the legal, political and cultural foundations of an entire society to their liking.  It’s a society in which words lose their conventional meaning as notions of “division” and “divisiveness” become synonymous -- not with hatred, intolerance and violence -- but with the stubborn refusal of “nonbelievers” to “conform.”

And now that Ted Cruz became the first major candidate to announce for president last week, it’s “game on” for 2016.

Views: 127

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on March 31, 2015 at 6:48am

I hope I'm right to think he won't raise the dough to continue into the 2016 calendar year.

Comment by Carole Dixon on March 31, 2015 at 7:08am
Great treatise on the topic.
Comment by Dr.Spud44 on March 31, 2015 at 7:32am

Great essay!  I especially liked the clash explanation.  Cruz is just out to make money and will as the nutty Christians love people like him and simple Sarah Palin and are more than willing to send them money.  

Comment by koshersalaami on March 31, 2015 at 8:20am
I like the explanation of how they view America through a lens of faith. That's instructive and perceptive.
Comment by nerd cred on March 31, 2015 at 9:26am

wrapped in the flag and waving a cross

(jw - I keep hearing that Jeb already has all the money.)

Comment by Ted Frier on March 31, 2015 at 10:07am

Thanks everyone, this is a very important topic because it goes to the heart of what kind of a society we live in, one governed by a secular belief system that allows different groups to live together peacefully or one that gives inordinate power and preference to religious sensibilities through an exploitation of a First Amendment said to prioritize religious beliefs over all other ones, such as scientific, medical and humanistic.  

Closely related to the issues raised in this article about Ted Cruz is the controversy raging over Indiana's new anti-gay law.  Governor Mike Pence should really be renamed Governor Mike Parse because he is doing his level best telling us his state's new "religious freedom" law does not do what of course it does do, which is to give bigots the right to discriminate against gays provided their bigotry is endorsed by their religious faith.  In his Wall Street Journal op-ed he says the new law is needed because under existing law "the First Amendment’s free exercise clause could not be raised as a defense to generally applicable laws, even if the law infringed on a person’s religious liberty."  Thn ose "generally applicable laws" include civil rights laws that prohibit providers of public services and accommodations from discriminating against anyone in the provision of some service.  Pence is doing his best to keep the issue focused on religious "freedom" and he grows increasingly impatient when people keep asking "freedom to do what?" 

Once upon a time, reactionaries tried to use "property rights" as a reason people who owned hotels and restaurants could refuse to serve blacks and other minorities.  Today, these same owners of public accommodations are trying to claim their religious freedoms are being abridged if they do not have the freedom to discriminate against people their faith identifies as outcasts.  It is one thing for our democracy to provide a protected sanctuary for people to practice their religion in private, however bizarre their beliefs might be.  It is another for people to inflict their religious tenets on the rest of us simply because they have the money to own some public establishment.  That is what I said when the Catholic bishops wanted a waiver for providing birth control to employees of Catholic universities, hospitals and other money-making ventures.  A hospital is not a church, and if you want to open an establishment that serves the American public then you have to abide by the same laws that affect all other employers.  America is a nation that values religious freedom, but unlike some other nations we are not a "religious" nation where "public" norms and mores and "religious" norms and mores are one and the same.    

Comment by fred hallman on March 31, 2015 at 11:30am

Matt:23-2} "1Then Jesus spoke to the crowds and to His disciples, 2saying: "The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; 3therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them.…

And that's how you spell hypocrisy.

Comment by Phyllis on March 31, 2015 at 12:44pm

This post was a light bulb, I've been pondering for a long time about why religious conservatives are so hateful. I knew it was about power and too many people fighting for resources, but this as the type of society they want to build makes sense. Thank you, i will add this to the stew that is my brain. :)

Comment by Abrawang on March 31, 2015 at 10:01pm

Great critique Ted.  His interpretation of the country's founding principles was bizarrely ahistorical.  Still, in the current political climate someone's gotta leech up the evangelical crazy vote and Cruz is just the man to do it.


You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon


10 More Great TV Series

Posted by John Manchester on April 23, 2019 at 10:08am 0 Comments

Notes From Earth Day

Posted by Robert B. James on April 23, 2019 at 7:36am 1 Comment

Earth Day

Posted by Anna Herrington on April 22, 2019 at 10:30am 8 Comments

The Big One

Posted by Robert B. James on April 22, 2019 at 7:26am 0 Comments

Vũng Tàu

Posted by Rodney Roe on April 22, 2019 at 6:53am 10 Comments

Victim of Memory

Posted by Doc Vega on April 21, 2019 at 8:29am 0 Comments

© 2019   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service