Sebastian Junger recently wrote a book, Tribe-On Homecoming and Belonging.  It has been reviewed by the New York Times, and a very brief synopsis is this; veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan have had a difficult time reentering American society.  Why?  Why do half of returning veterans have PTSD when only ten percent saw combat?  Could it be that the cohesive order, basic equality, and fraternity – in the French sense – are missing in American society; that American society is broken?

 

The military boasts that, unlike previous periods of our history when we relied on the draft to support our military ranks, the all-volunteer military is able to pick and choose and get the best to send into harm’s way.  Perhaps that is the problem.  If, they get the best and brightest perhaps they get thinkers who are able to ask the question,

“What have we been fighting for?”

I recently heard a Unitarian/universalist chaplain, who joined the Army in order to go to Afghanistan and serve the troops, speak about his experience.  This man was certainly not typical of the chaplain’s service.  A few years ago only 5% of U.S. troops identified themselves as Evangelical Christians.  Despite that fact, 30% of chaplains were Evangelical Christians.  Unitarian/universalists aren’t even particularly Christian.  Secondly, he was an independent thinker.  He did not register for the draft at eighteen because he did not want to be in a military that fought, not for the safety of America, but to protect the corporate interests of big business around the globe.

He gave as his sermon one morning in Afghanistan, a talk about the basic lack of fairness in a decision that trades the lives of innocent civilians for the protection of U.S. troops in the form of drone strikes.  The lesson was well received by the troops, but those in command heard about it, and he was relieved of duty and sent back to the States, to receive a less than honorable discharge.  He asked for a hearing and was ultimately returned to duty where he served out the last three years of his enlistment and returned to civilian life.

Military non-combatants are placed in a position of privilege in the military; the rest of the troops look up to the “doc”, nurse and chaplain.  In return they ask for protection; relief from physical, spiritual and emotional pain, and comfort in dying.

Returning to civilian life can be as difficult for a combat medic as an infantryman.  Medics may come back into civilian life with a lot of experience in treating trauma, experience that is often equivalent to that of nurse practitioners or physician’s assistants, and are unable to put any of that to use without retraining in a civilian program.

I have an Iraq war veteran friend who went through an EMT/Paramedic program and is certified.  He has been in nursing school for some time, but can’t get any of his experience in the military counted as curriculum.  He is married, has two beautiful girls, and has only recently been referred for evaluation for PTSD.  I don’t think he has PTSD.  I think he is suffering from basic unfairness.  The tours he spent in Iraq count for nothing.

I asked him whether he volunteered for the military out of a sense of duty to country.  It turns out that there were no jobs in the area of Maine where he grew up at the time he got out of high school, and joining the military was the only way he saw to get gainful employment.  I do think the military got the “best and brightest” with him, but not for the reasons that they would have you believe.

 

So, to return to Junger’s hypothesis, America is broken.  The tremendous wealth disparity, lack of meaningful, gainful employment, and bitter divide in society along a number of axes, creates a hostile environment for returning veterans, one more hostile than the mountains of Afghanistan or the plains of Iraq.

It is as though the returning veterans have been cast out of the tribe.

The rest of us who have been here the whole time have never known the beauty of being part of a group in which everyone pulls together, protects his fellow soldier’s back, and is willing to die to protect the unit.  That sort of cohesiveness does not happen by accident.  A lot of shaping of people takes place, those who can’t be molded are rejected, and individualism is discouraged.

It could be argued that that is abnormal.  It could also be argued that it was normal in our pre-history, an argument that Junger, whose background is anthropology makes.

Think about the biblical stories that are set in the time when the people of Israel were tribes living in the desert.  What was the worst sentence possible for someone who broke the law?  Exile.

This is the Homecoming we all want to believe in.

Views: 52

Comment by Myriad on February 21, 2017 at 5:27am

The country is too big and there is too much mobility - nuclear families scattered across the continent.  Hard to achieve and maintain the kind of units humankind grew up in.  (I read once that one's upper limit of friends was about 75, which was the largest size of a family or tribal group in the wild.  We have to associate with much larger numbers of people, many strangers whom we'll never see again, and all our imaginary friends on tv and the internet...

Comment by Rodney Roe on February 21, 2017 at 5:44am

To my imaginary friend, Myriad, thanks for commenting.  Someone once remarked that there was a reason that Jesus had 12 desciples; that was as large a group as could ever find consensus.  People can only keep 6 things in their head at a time (which is why solitaire has 7 columns) and why we need some of our actions to be automatic.  I haven't seen that, but I am sure that 75 is the limit of a group with common purpose.

So, nothing that we do involves 75 or less except some family reunions (I once attended one that included 250 adults.  Of course, I never met most of them and would never see them again.)  City governments, county governments and state governments all govern groups that are too large.  What to do?

Comment by Terry McKenna on February 21, 2017 at 7:29am

2 comments, the first is the rate of PTSD correlates somewhat with intelligence (at least in what I have read). That is, those who are smarter (in layman's terms) have the cognitive wherewithal to recover from trauma. The second is that in Iraq, non combatants are not really being the lines - so can have traumatizing experiences.

Comment by JMac1949 Today on February 21, 2017 at 8:05am

R&L  Many people from dysfunctional families suffer from PTSD and the symptoms present at later dates in other circumstances.  Looking back, I've been living with it since I was ten or eleven.  I often considered that a significant percentage of Americans are suffering and don't known they're afflicted.

Comment by alsoknownas on February 21, 2017 at 10:27am

Rodney,

Can you imagine what DaVinci's  "Last Supper" would have looked like with 75 disciples? It would have been more like a Mort Drucker cartoon.

Comment by Myriad on February 21, 2017 at 10:48am

Haha, I've been to mass family reunions, fewer than 100 people but that was a crowd too far.  Since my father was one of 13, there are a zillion cousins.  Fecundity steadily declined in subsequent generations, but it's still a lot of people ... who don't have a lot in common.  This summer is gonna be only descendants of my father (who had 2 fams - widowed, not bigamist) and might not be a lot more than 20.  (Less me and my descendants - prob not gonna make the trek.)

What to do, what to do?  People have over the millennia learned to live with and identify with bigger and bigger groups.  Lots of identifying with nation, albeit w. a lot of internal divisions.  The big leap to make (baby steps w. League of Nations and U.N.) is to escape the national bounds and identify w. the human race as a whole.  .... Actually there have been quite successful efforts at universal identity, with religions.  And even some places and periods of religions co-existing... We're sort of getting there...  But time is running out, because co-existing with the planet is not coming along quickly enough...

Comment by koshersalaami on February 21, 2017 at 12:14pm

America is broken. We can't take care of our own because the resources have been removed by the Have Alls. 

Comment by Myriad on February 21, 2017 at 12:30pm

Somewhat related (or at least to my own brooding about Why Can't We All Just Get Along - and agree on the effing FACTS for chrissake... uh, whatever the facts are, and I can't 'prove' shit) - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-...

Comment by Rodney Roe on February 21, 2017 at 2:21pm

Kosh, the returning soldiers know that in some way they have enabled that.

The author makes the point that along the frontier explorers "went native" voluntarily and did not want to return. That was true even for captured some captured women. It seemed to be the attraction to belonging to a group.

Comment by Foolish Monkey on February 22, 2017 at 8:03am

the homecoming film, like all of them is what we really are.  we love our love, our families, our children.  we live to survive, we love those who sacrifice themselves to protecting us.  we lost sight of that for a few years, but that was I think an aberration.  we love our heroes.

there's a belief among liberals that those who voted for trump are evil or ignorant or some other negative.  it's hard to be angry with people who are so desperate, so alone, they responded to a man who spent his own money to save them.  that's pretty compelling.  

there's a PBS three parter on frontline that speaks to the promises this president made and how difficult it will be to keep them because they are predicated on a lie.  for example, there's a segment on water where a CA farmer and his wife who owns a local small diner, two intelligent and well versed in the subject people who are slowly and surely losing everything because of the water situation, refuse ADAMANTLY refuse to acknowledge global warming or the environment.  they call it "cyclical" and believe it will somehow right itself. cheshire has a piece called THE RIVER ANGRY that address this willf...

it's not that these people are angry or racist or hateful, but they've been taught a truth that they have every reason to believe.  I have to assume the state of CA, and I lived there and it is for the most part relatively responsible - yet, these farmers have not been educated by their AG dept, by their governor.  There hasn't been funding appropriated to formally school these people.  The water has flowed to whoever had the money to pipe it in.   But we blame the people.  it's a collusion of idiocy. 

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon

© 2017   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service