Recent remarks by Tim Wise, a figure known nationally for his views on race, admonishing his audience to "listen" to people from other races is a bit discouraging given experience and the years that have gone by, but not since a president has been elected using racial baiting as a campaign tactic.

     It appears we are back to square one and the prognosis is not good.  How many outbreaks will there be in the "Trump" era and we have no idea what his response will be--nor the response to him. As a white male, I am most concerned about the hotheads on either side leading us further down the road to national disgrace and ruin.  As a former Detroiter, I've seen it happen and have little doubt it can happen again.  History more often than not repeats itself; the lessons are rarely learned.

     One thing Mr. Wise doesn't mention listening to is the voices from the past, especially given what has transpired so far in the battle of ideas over what to do about it.  In this regard, I'm encouraged by one development: the revival of interest in the work of James Baldwin.  He is the survivor of the wars of the past in influencing the future.  It should be remembered he was eclipsed during his lifetime for many years by the hotheads, who held sway of the headlines and the fears of those easily influenced by them.

    I recall seeing Baldwin booed off the stage by his plea for moderation.  After all, his seminal message, that it is not the victim who is defined by racism, but the perpetrator, was offensive to perpetrator and victim alike--and took thought to understand--a rare commodity regardless of one's race.  I remember reading "The Fire Next Time" in my parents kitchen in the suburbs of Detroit, while the tanks were entering our old neighborhood, finding at least some comfort in the depth of his understanding and attempt to reach out to all sides.

     In retrospect, I'm not sure what's worse: the hotheads who take over, or the obfuscaters who use events to promote themselves and their own interests.  They're the ones who narrow the discussion to the participants at any one time, or broaden it beyond the reach of individual responsibility. Baldwin made race and prejudice of any kind a moral issue that is firstly and lastly determined within the mind and heart of the "listeners."

     So no doubt, that is the prerequisite.  It's not enough to root for a team that is not composed of people from your race, or admire a singer or actor from that people.  Or to even see that today many of the commentators on our most fundamental issues are from all backgrounds, or that the unthinkable has happened in Baldwin's time: a man of color not only became our president, but a president who served everyone--not just those who elected him. Nobody knew that better than Obama.  

     The backlash was and is inevitable.  Listeners are and will always be in short supply as are those who can read a book by Baldwin or anybody and have their own thinking changed by it. The city of Detroit that I grew up in is gone.  What remains is still highly segregated and I see little disposition to think about the consequences as time goes by.  I'm one of the thousands, indeed, the millions who left because he saw no future in a place so desolated by racial confrontation.  Has there been a mass migration from a major city in our history greater than what happened in Detroit?

     Bitterness and resentment remain entrenched 50ty years after the riots.  Great disparity doesn't work.  It's a sad, sad cliche to have to repeat saying it only breeds discontent.  If the forces of moderation both in terms of ideas and actual experience do not change civility for everyone is threatened.  Baldwin said this again and again.  Many who know it are neither talking nor listening.

     It is not so much the overt racists that concern me since there is little that can be done about them, but those who are simply negligent in admitting they have any responsibility in the matter.  A racist today knows they have to lie in most communities and certainly when their community reaches the spotlight because of that negligence.  Only then do those who know better wake up.  That's the simple truth.    

     There were few if any leaders when they were needed in Detroit, but nothing quite like it had been seen before. That is no longer true. If nothing else, perhaps there are a few more at this time in the nation's history. Those able to recognize them when they appear will not allow cynicism to drown them out.  Tim Wise appears to be one of them.    

Views: 84

Comment by Ron Powell on Thursday

Yes he does..... 

Comment by JMac1949 Today on Thursday

I lived in Los Angeles for most of my adult life and I found it to be the least segregated mosaic city in the USA.  I suppose that NYC might be even more so.  A few years ago it got to the point that I couldn't afford it, and after a couple of moves through the So Cal suburbs, I now live in Central Texas.  Even here there is ample evidence of racially mixed families and integrated institutions, particularly in law enforcement.  I'm not sure if people are listening or just inter breeding but perhaps the fictional Senator Bullworth has an answer "a voluntary, free spirited, open ended procreative program of racial deconstruction" :

Comment by Ben Sen on Thursday

NYC is by far the most polyglot city in the US as far as I know, especially the boroughs,  though San Fran is also remarkable. Manhattan is for the rich regardless of anything else.  It's where I live but I got a deal.   

Comment by Ben Sen yesterday

Barbara and Ned:  Thanks for listening and sharing my post.  It helps me feel the time spent writing it wasn't wasted.  

Comment by Ben Sen yesterday

Barbara and Ned:  Thanks for listening and sharing my post.  It helps me feel the time spent writing it wasn't wasted.  

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon

© 2017   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service