For Mr Assange, in Memoriam 2010; 2016; 2019

Mr Assange & the Fawning Far Left·        

Originally Posted in 2010 & 2016

I've never seen him as anything but a likely scoundrel. I shared a piece at OPEN SALON (below) saying so when the Far Left here and in Europe began its usual fawning over people they only 'know' on the surface. A problem the Far Left has and has had since the mid-1960s, is that whenever a previously little-known person tells the West loudly and, even more so, with tech-savvy, that it can go to hell, no matter the specific content of the message and without regard to whatever else the person may be, the Far Left celebrates that person and too often places itself in the morally and untenable position of defending the increasingly indefensible. That's what my head tells me. My gut tells me that if Mr Assange is shown not, in fact, to be guilty of the sex crimes with which he's been charged in Sweden, I'll be genuinely surprised.---

Why I'm Skeptical of Mr. Assange and his Followers 

Published at Open Salon, 9 December, 2010 The Wiki-Tekkies make me feel so old and left behind.     I marched.     I wrote and petitioned.      But Oh how we have grown. Oh how we have advanced. I am left in CyberDust.     Campus tech-savvies of the 'sixties, some of whom called themselves leftists, some wanting to be known as liberals or even progressives (the term was used), some more pleased with radical, really got off striking blows to The System. Some went so far as to find a pal who could whistle in perfect-pitch and rip off Ma Bell!     Think about it!     How juicily subversive!     They could stand in cold, obscure, cinder-block corners of their and their co-consprators' college dorms, pick up the pay-phone receiver, and with maybe ten or more others whose parents footed the bills for this foolery, made calls, from Philly to 'Frisco, from New York to New London, from L.A. to El Salvador, and really get off!      That bastard phone company, those faceless university deans who grudgingly gave you only a partial aid package  and made you work for it, The Capitalist System Itself--you and your buds really stuck it to 'em! And if you got a C on the paper you had to finish that night instead of your more usual B- because you spent most of the night phonily phoning faux-friends and firms in the Philippines, that's just the price of 'real' patriotism.      All this Strike-A-Blow tinkering turned out to be decidedly un-fun, and the 'worth-it calculus' required recalibration when three members of the the SDS-offshoot, The Weather Underground, blew themselves to bits in a Greenwich Village townhouse, on 6 March 1970.      The legions of men and women now targetting Mastercard, Visa, PayPal, Amazon, the Swedish prosecutor's office and other sites in what seem to be an escalating series of cyber assaults have put me in mind of my--well not precisely my--youth.  And the Facebook and Twitter leadership are now roiling because they face the real possibility of serious legal action for openly hosting communications among some of those planning these attacks. The sites, of course, and those using them, will argue free speech; prosecutors may well see these sites as hosting conspiracies to break numbers of laws.      Legal teams on both sides are pulling for-profit all-nighters.  I am certain in my mind that there's more to Julian Assange than a simple Champion of People's Justice.      Can anyone lay out here his full and complete background and his history of good works prior to his Wiki-Leaks? In all of what's been written--and I read a good deal--I cannot make out a consistent back-story that explains his  Now. He almost appears to have emerged on the stage not very unlike the fairly obscure thirty-three-year-old Jesus, riding a white donkey into a viciously angry Jerusalem mob-scene thoroughly ripe for revolution, overturning the money-changers' tables and inciting both the wrath of the Romans and the adoration of the masses. And then, he, quite clearly a good man without a clear past, is murdered. (There's a reason Phil Och's last anthem, Crucifixion, has been burning my brain ever since Mr. Assange has become who he has become.  [YouTube - Phil Ochs - Crucifixion (Live Stockholm 1969)])      What I want to know of Mr. Assange judgment still somewhat suspended is what Cary Grant demands of Eva Marie-Saint, in Hitch'sNorth By Northwest:             How Does a Girl Like You Get to be a Girl Like You?  I am willing to believe that there's a comlplex set of desires and motivations in the puckish man that includes a desire to do Good, and I am also willing to think that the sex charges may be fraudulent. For some it's obvious that the charges are trumped-up. They may well be. That will out. My gut says there's something to it, at least enough for me to withhold adoration.      What will also out is the efficacy, the social benefit, that allegedly accrues from making every diplomatic cable and conversation among nations and their representatives public. Some think that, by definition, we live better when governments must always transact business in harsh sunlight only. For many this seems an obvious benefit of what Mr. Assange is trying to do. I am not so sure.      I would ask you who were alive in October, 1962, if you really would've wanted a Julian Assange to throw open the exchanges among Mr. Kruschev, Mr. Castro, and the Kennedy brothers over Cuban missiles. I have no little, myself, that had that occurred, the blinding light of truth would have been likely fast followed by the blinding light of nuclear detonation. I think the great majority of those now conspiring to take down the symbols and the guts of governments, diplomacy, and business...those enthral to Mr. Assange as a personality and those who are not...for them Wiki-Leaks/Mr. Assange is a train that finally, finally came on-time. These people, figuratively, have been waiting, itching, ever since they realized that their illegal long-distance 1960's dorm calls didn't bring down The System, or even Ma Bell. 

& isn't it fun how impossible it is to know, now, whether or not the man feels more Right, Left, or just Skilled, in some ways, and Bloody Nuts?

Views: 67

Comments are closed for this blog post

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 12:12pm

GOOD WEEK TO ALL

Comment by koshersalaami on April 22, 2019 at 12:34pm

He likes to spill detains whether they make sense or not. And anyone who deliberately aids Republicans like he did is no Leftist. 

Comment by alsoknownas on April 22, 2019 at 12:37pm

We're just as likely to be undone by the unrelentingly self-righteous on the extreme left as we are by the toadish semi-literates on the far right. 

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 12:39pm

Kosh  ad yet it was the Far Left who lionised him in 2010.

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 12:39pm

AKA   wholly right

Comment by Ron Powell on April 22, 2019 at 1:22pm

Extremism of any stripe almost always undoes itself...

Comment by Anna Herrington on April 22, 2019 at 1:24pm

I don't get Assange, but admit I haven't really read up on this topic of whether he's this or that... 

I will say reports of his filth while being hosted at the embassy weren't so appealing. Speaks to something, if this is true, that anyone would leave personal hygiene of self and personal space up to others, when he actually ought to have been fastidious, considering he was completely beholden to those folks, for a long time.... or there's mental health issues....? 

I don't know... whether you're a slob or not at home, at least be a considerate 'guest.'

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 1:35pm

A.H.  yes. 

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 1:35pm

Ron...I agree

Comment by koshersalaami on April 22, 2019 at 3:53pm

A guy who likes to spill government secrets is going to be liked by the Left. The first problem is in what secrets he didn’t hesitate to spill. When a government is surreptitiously cooperating with yours when it comes to gathering intelligence on terrorists who want to kill civilians, embarrassing that government for doing so does nothing but further terrorism. The second problem is that his secret spilling eventually became partisan on behalf of people who were extremely unegalitarian. Snowden didn’t do data dumps, he released information to change egregious policies. Assange just generally targeted the US government, and eventually specifically the Democrats within it. Anyone who believes that someone actively working on behalf of getting Trump elected could possibly deserve credit from the Left for doing so is, to put it as mildly as I can, not exercising judgment. (Wasn’t that admirably polite?) 

NEW BLOG POSTS

The Wall

Posted by Steel Breeze on May 20, 2019 at 11:43am 2 Comments

A Little Spanish Night Music

Posted by Rodney Roe on May 20, 2019 at 9:49am 3 Comments

Now Now

Posted by Robert B. James on May 20, 2019 at 7:51am 1 Comment

The Final Frontier

Posted by Robert B. James on May 19, 2019 at 7:34am 2 Comments

More Notes To Self

Posted by Robert B. James on May 18, 2019 at 7:32am 2 Comments

Half_____?

Posted by Steel Breeze on May 18, 2019 at 5:31am 9 Comments

© 2019   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service