Climate Change Global Tyranny and Agenda 21

Global Warming and the Lies that Attempt to legitimize Global Slavery

People need to wake up before it's too late and they find themselves and their countries beneath a global army with orders to kill if the peasants and their foolish governments attempt to question draconian wisdom!

Agenda 21: Central planning on steroids: Global warming believers unmasked by Climategate.

President Barack Obama brought Agenda 21 back to center stage once again by signing an Executive Order to establish a White House Rural Council to coordinate federal management of rural America, including family farms. Recent examples of their activities include a proposal by the Department of Transportation that would require everyone on a farm to obtain a Commercial Driver’s License to operate farming equipment. Also proposed was a ban on children under 18 from working on family farms, although that proposal was withdrawn after a firestorm of protests. And a continued war by the FDA on dairies that sell raw milk.

The use of Executive Orders and the federal bureaucracy to pursue actions related to Agenda 21 has resulted in the enactment of laws not supported by the public and not passed by Congress. For example, one of the most important environmental programs tied to Agenda 21 was cap-and-trade legislation.

The “cap” in cap-and-trade being the legal limit on the quantity of greenhouse gases a region could emit each year and “trade” meaning that companies could swap emission permits among themselves. When cap-and-trade legislation failed to pass in the Senate, the EPA took it upon itself to regulate greenhouse gases, in effect usurping the role of Congress.

According to critics, at the heart of Agenda 21 are a number of goals that are contrary to American values, including: redistribution of wealth; abolishment of private property; population control and reduction; government-sanctioned monopolies through private-public partnerships; implementation of “sustainable development” policies at the local level; elimination of the middle class; collective instead of individual rights; and elimination of unsustainable uses of the environment, such as single-family homes, private cars, air conditioning, paved roads, dams and reservoirs, power lines, ski runs, fences, hunting, logging, industrial activity, livestock grazing and farming.

In effect, a form of neo-feudalism, but with a high-tech, “we are the world” look to it. Call it “1984″ meets “Brave New World.”

Americans remain largely in the dark about these developments because they are not widely covered in the mainstream media and because the plans have been put into effect gradually over the past 20 years. Indeed what is covered by the national media is little more than tub thumping by the global warming crowd. The most recent example of this being an editorial in Scientific American stating that “Effective World Government Will be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe.”

To make its case for Agenda 21, proponents have relied on “research” coming from governments, universities, think tanks and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Critics have accused some of these groups of altering their findings to fit a particular political agenda. One example of this being the claim that industrialization has resulted in climate change or manmade global warming.

Anthropogenic global warming: science or politics?

One of the major tenets of Agenda 21 is the need to control human development because of the damage done to the Earth.

Energy use, and particularly the use of fossil fuels, is blamed for alleged changes in the climate worldwide and makes up what is called the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory.

However, research and events over the last few years have raised doubts about the science behind AGW.

In 2009, for example, 61 megabytes of confidential e-mails between researchers at the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (UEACRU) were hacked and released to the public in a scandal later dubbed “Climategate.”

The e-mails revealed that East Anglia researchers had conspired with other researchers to exaggerate the amount of global warming, had silenced dissent by making it difficult for scientists who disagreed to have their work published, had manipulated temperature data to fit their theory, and had destroyed evidence at odds with their theory.

Since it was East Anglia, along with other institutions, that was feeding research findings to the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), air began leaking out of the global warming balloon.

Following the Climategate scandal, additional research has cast even more doubt on the theory of AGW. The director of East Anglia, for example, finally admitted that the earth was actually warmer during the Medieval Warming Period than it is today.

Surveys of polar bear populations revealed their numbers were stable or growing, not declining. Claims of losses in the rainforests that were attributed to global warming were instead the result of logging. A new study established that the Himalayas have suffered no significant loss of ice over the past decade. Last, the most recent evidence is that world temperatures have risen less than two-tenths of 1 degree Fahrenheit in the last 20 years. Indeed some researchers now think it’s more likely that we are entering a new mini Ice Age.

MIT scientist

Scientists dissenting from the theory of AGW have also become more outspoken about the flaws in the science.

One of these is Dr. Richard Lindzen who is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT. He has written and spoken out against the AGW theory.

He said that over the last 150 years there have been temperature changes of only tenths of a degree, which calls into question the claim that industrialization has raised the Earth’s mean temperature.

“There’s no doubt that what we do will have some effect, but even the doubling of CO2 would have a relatively small effect, only a change of 1 degree,” he said. “Models created by AGW scientists increase CO2 levels by a factor of 5 and everyone acknowledges that those are highly improbable.”

Lindzen said that scientists who don’t agree with the AGW proponents are often silenced. The Climategate e-mails included statements to the effect that any scientific journal editor who published articles critical of AGW would be severely attacked or fired. He said that he has been subject to it himself in cases where he was written articles for publication. Once those articles were published, the editor was immediately fired.

“Moreover, journals like Nature and Science have publicly declared that they will not publish anything that questions global warming,” he said. “This is a political movement that co-ops a lot of things. Any time you hear anyone say, ‘Believe us because we have authority and you can’t check it yourself,’ you should be suspicious. And I think the public at large is.”

Lindzen is not alone in his skepticism. A petition was submitted to Congress in 2008 that was signed by over 31,000 American scientists, including 9,000 with Ph.D.s. Many of the signers currently work in climatological, meteorological, atmospheric, environmental, geophysical, astronomical and biological fields directly involved in the climate change controversy.

The petition states,”There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate … Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

However, not much has changed as a result of these revelations, because ultimately AGW theory is not about science but about global governance and, to a lesser extent, about making money. It is more about a belief system.

In short, it’s bunk.

President Trump saved the US from being trapped into an international climate accord that favored nations like Russia and China allowed to pollute many times more than the US which is already a world leader in clean environment!

 

Views: 34

Comment by Maui Surfer on December 6, 2018 at 12:49pm

JFC- so, you put smog in the atmosphere for the entire Industrial Revolution, couple centuries now, and it has no effect!  Hmmmm ....

Comment by koshersalaami on December 6, 2018 at 9:42pm
Comment by alsoknownas on December 7, 2018 at 8:22am
Comment by Doc Vega on December 7, 2018 at 4:59pm

alsoknownas I wrote part of this and it doesn't make a difference if I wrote the entirety! The fact is that it's true, okay. Read the content. That's what is important!

Comment by Doc Vega on December 7, 2018 at 5:07pm

Maui, it is a FACT that the establishment refuse to fund scientists who do not support global warming! A FACT Why? Because this is the NAZI fascist approach refusing acknowledgment, trying to legitimize lies, attempting to quell the voice of reason! Why? Let me ask you why would Agenda think that while denying that we need a dairy industry, that hydro electricity is unsupportable, that paved roads are prohibitive, that 50% of north America must revert back to the wild while a global army is ready to enforce these insane agendas while forcing our children to listen to this bullshit as the brain washing it is denying them land ownership, cars, and allowing UN non insured construction of pack'em stack'em housing near railways while denying cars only allowing bikes! This is fucking bullshit you fucking fascist fucker!

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

NEW BLOG POSTS

Trump epitaph

Posted by Dicky Neely on December 17, 2018 at 2:30pm 1 Comment

Same Shit, Different Day

Posted by Tom Cordle on December 17, 2018 at 12:30pm 6 Comments

A Question for the 2020 Electoral Cycle

Posted by Ron Powell on December 17, 2018 at 11:33am 1 Comment

After All

Posted by Robert B. James on December 17, 2018 at 8:00am 4 Comments

Meatballs Go Well

Posted by Robert B. James on December 16, 2018 at 8:30am 3 Comments

Why is it always Texas?

Posted by Ron Powell on December 16, 2018 at 5:00am 6 Comments

Trump introduces new cabinet nominees!

Posted by Dicky Neely on December 15, 2018 at 2:20pm 1 Comment

The Bit Player

Posted by Robert B. James on December 15, 2018 at 9:30am 5 Comments

© 2018   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service