Barry, Barry, Barry... You Were In On The Con All Along, Weren'tcha?

Image result for smiling obama

When good 'ol Barry "Just one of the common folk" Obama said during his last State of the Union speech, "How do we give everyone a fair shot at opportunity and security in this new economy?", how many of you thought he meant giving mega-buck speeches to Wall St.?

How many of you thought that he would accept these ridiculously high speakers fees for the people he called, back in 2009, "fat cat bankers on Wall Street”?

Image result for smug obama

Welp, if you are surprised...  SURPRISE!  'Ol Barry is as big of a Wall St. whore as his buddies Eric "Revolving Door" Holder and Hillary "Let Them Eat Cake" Clinton!

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during the Seeds&Chips Global Food Innovation Summit on May 9, 2017 in Milan, Italy.

After Failing to Prosecute Bankers, Obama Cashes In With Wall Street Speeches

The former president is reportedly raking in $400,000 per speech to massive financial firms

Less than a year has passed since he departed from the White House, and former President Barack Obama has already joined the "well trod and well paid" Wall Street speaking circuit, a decision many argued will negatively impact the Democratic Party's credibility as it attempts to fashion a message around taking on corporate monopolies, tackling income inequality, and loosening the insurance industry's control over the American healthcare system.

"This is a really crappy thing to do to the people who poured their hearts into his campaigns and administration." 
—Matt Stoller, Open Markets Institute

According to a Bloomberg report published Monday, Obama has in the last month delivered two speeches to massive financial firms—Northern Trust Corp and the Carlyle Group—for around $400,000 a pop, and he is slated to attend a three-day conference hosted by Cantor Fitzgerald next week, for which he will make another $400,000.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton faced a wave of intense criticism following her paid speeches to Wall Street during the 2016 presidential campaign, and later conceded that they weren't politically wise.

Obama, however, doesn't appear to harbor any concerns about the political impact his speeches may have—a fact that could be problematic for the Democratic Party, Bloomberg's Max Abelson notes.

"While he can't run for president, he continues to be an influential voice in a party torn between celebrating and vilifying corporate power," Abelson writes. "His new work with banks might suggest which side of the debate he'll be on."

News of Obama's decision to "cash in" following his eight-year presidency drew significant ire, particularly given his administration's failure to enact sufficient structural changes to the financial system following the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression.

As Abelson observes, Obama's "Justice Department prosecuted no major bankers for their roles in the financial crisis, and he resisted calls to break up the biggest banks, signing a regulatory overhaul that annoyed them with new rules but didn't stop them from pulling in record profits."

Responding to Bloomberg's report, a Twitter user asked Ryan Cooper, national correspondent for The Week, what a person could do in order to receive $400,000 for a single speech.

Cooper responded with a two-step plan:

1) become president
2) do not enforce laws against securities or mortgage fraud

Others reacted similarly to the former president's lucrative speeches, noting that given Obama's continued power over the direction of the Democratic Party—which was demonstrated in his successful push for former Labor Secretary Tom Perez to become chair of the Democratic National Committee over Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.)—is reason enough for him to abandon the Wall Street circuit.

"This is a really crappy thing to do to the people who poured their hearts into his campaigns and administration," concluded Matt Stoller, a fellow at the Open Markets Institute. "Hillary Clinton publicly talking about why she lost [the 2016 election] is far healthier than private speeches to the Carlyle Group."

For investigative journalist Nomi Prins, Obama's Wall Street speeches are indicative of the deep, inescapable influence the nation's largest financial institutions exert over political discussion and policy in the United States.

"Wall Street knows no party," Prins concluded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

So there ya go!  

I know there are a bunch of people here who think Barry was super-dooper and other who will come back with the same old sorry shit of "But he's no longer in office so why care? He TRIED!!!!"  To all of them, please don't be telling me how Obama tried to solve the problem, but the mean 'ol Republicans wouldn't let him...

He WAS part of the problem and he is now reaping his rewards from his corporate masters who are counting your their money and are saying "THANKS OBAMA!".

Image result for screwed by obama meme

Views: 100

Comment by Safe Bet's Amy on September 18, 2017 at 3:49pm

BTW, no neolibs were hurt in the making of this post.  No need to thank me...  it wasn't intentional.

Comment by koshersalaami on September 18, 2017 at 4:41pm

I don't care if he takes speaking fees - let him cost Wall Street money - but he was a corporatist President. The Republicans refused the cooperate with him at all because he's Black, not liberal. They started working to get him defeated before they had a clue what he'd do in office. He deported more convicted Mexican criminals than Bush did.  ACA was a gift to Republicans because one of their think tanks wrote it. The lack of Wall Street prosecutions in the aftermath of the housing crash was unconscionable. He came late to gay marriage. Guantanamo probably was on the Republicans, but that's not much. 

Because you're right about his corporatism, Rated.

Comment by Ron Powell on September 18, 2017 at 7:44pm

What would you expect from a Harvard lawyer?

He's been doing what he's been trained to do since day one of his career. 

Comment by nanatehay on September 18, 2017 at 8:44pm

I'm with Ron - It's just another shell game from another political purveyor of "Observe What I Say, Not What I Do." Of course, when I look at 45 I think, "Dang, I sure do miss Barry," but that's a pretty low bar to beat. 

Comment by cheshyre on September 20, 2017 at 9:24pm

It will be years before his true treachery is revealed. I thought his parting letter to Caligula about respecting the "rule of law" was pretty rich considering on day one he made no bones about flouting the law and refusing to investigate torture allegations which goes to the heart and soul of who we are as a people. And of course codifying a policy to not enforce corporate laws and the extra-judicial drone strikes made for an outlaw President. The only laws he did enforce were immigration laws with his record deportations breaking families apart. Obama is one sterile cold customer.
But to leave open the door to allow 2008's collapse to happen all over again when the whole world was screaming for the banks' heads is a complete betrayal of every American. I too have read the glowing tributes and one day those people will be branded fools. The particular hatred for justice he displayed is grounded in his knowing that the justice coming to him will be very, very unpleasant.


You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon


Apartheid Version 2.0

Posted by Safe Bet's Amy on July 21, 2018 at 7:32am 2 Comments

Dreaming at My Age

Posted by Ben Sen on July 20, 2018 at 7:00pm 0 Comments


Posted by Ben Sen on July 20, 2018 at 11:14am 2 Comments

Off With His Head!!!!!

Posted by Safe Bet's Amy on July 20, 2018 at 7:03am 10 Comments

Birth of a New Day

Posted by Ron Powell on July 19, 2018 at 3:30am 11 Comments

A Body of Work

Posted by Rosigami on July 18, 2018 at 3:47pm 12 Comments

© 2018   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service