What might the outcome have been had these people chosen anonymity and submitted this document unsigned?
First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few.
Secondly, what amazes me is that most of the same people that want to burn Snowden, Manning and Assuage at the stake for public disclosure of even less damaging things that were embarrassing to a Democratic administration are perfectly okay with the "person" who wrote the op-ed staying anonymous because it harms a Republican administration. Makes a person want to yell, "Insanely partisan, much?".
Snowden, Manning, and Assange are not equivalent to each other. Presenting Obama and Trump as equivalent shows an almost nonexistent understanding of the Presidency.
As I said elsewhere today: If Deep Throat had resigned, Nixon would have served out his second term. That’s a much closer parallel than the Declaration.
Nice red herring you tossed out there, KB. Planning on serving it for dinner after it stops flip flopping?
None of what was written in the Washington Post was attributed to Deep Throat contemporaneously. He was an anonymous source not an anonymous author...Huge difference transactiinally and functionally.
Re the Declaration and this recent anonymoust NYT OP-ED:
It's not about the documents per se regarding a parallel or equivalency...It's about courage of conviction and 'owning it'.
Amy; "First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few."
"Those guys", as you call them, were not unknown to the Americans of their day, and many we're known to King George III...
Again it was about courage of conviction and "owning it" as you might say..
On the other hand:
Perhaps a unanimously anonymous document could not have been used to support a unified colonial revolt against British rule and the colonies would not have become independent, in which case, all else remaining the same, slavery in Britain's American colonies would have been legally abolished thirty years prior to its being abolished in what had become the United States of America: Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
@Moki; Good point....
Welcome toOur Salon
Posted by Robert B. James on November 12, 2018 at 5:49pm
Posted by Ron Powell on November 12, 2018 at 5:00pm
Posted by Rodney Roe on November 12, 2018 at 9:24am
Posted by Jonathan Wolfman on November 12, 2018 at 8:53am
Posted by Doc Vega on November 12, 2018 at 4:12am
Posted by Johnny Robish on November 11, 2018 at 9:04pm
Posted by koshersalaami on November 11, 2018 at 8:55pm
Posted by Doc Vega on November 11, 2018 at 6:41pm
Posted by Robert B. James on November 11, 2018 at 5:46pm
Posted by Ron Powell on November 11, 2018 at 10:00am
Posted by Tom Cordle on November 11, 2018 at 9:30am
Posted by Dicky Neely on November 11, 2018 at 7:11am
Posted by Boanerges on November 11, 2018 at 6:30am
Posted by Ron Powell on November 11, 2018 at 4:30am
Posted by Ron Powell on November 11, 2018 at 3:30am
© 2018 Created by lorianne.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.