What might the outcome have been had these people chosen anonymity and submitted this document unsigned?
First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few.
Secondly, what amazes me is that most of the same people that want to burn Snowden, Manning and Assuage at the stake for public disclosure of even less damaging things that were embarrassing to a Democratic administration are perfectly okay with the "person" who wrote the op-ed staying anonymous because it harms a Republican administration. Makes a person want to yell, "Insanely partisan, much?".
Snowden, Manning, and Assange are not equivalent to each other. Presenting Obama and Trump as equivalent shows an almost nonexistent understanding of the Presidency.
As I said elsewhere today: If Deep Throat had resigned, Nixon would have served out his second term. That’s a much closer parallel than the Declaration.
Nice red herring you tossed out there, KB. Planning on serving it for dinner after it stops flip flopping?
None of what was written in the Washington Post was attributed to Deep Throat contemporaneously. He was an anonymous source not an anonymous author...Huge difference transactiinally and functionally.
Re the Declaration and this recent anonymoust NYT OP-ED:
It's not about the documents per se regarding a parallel or equivalency...It's about courage of conviction and 'owning it'.
Amy; "First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few."
"Those guys", as you call them, were not unknown to the Americans of their day, and many we're known to King George III...
Again it was about courage of conviction and "owning it" as you might say..
On the other hand:
Perhaps a unanimously anonymous document could not have been used to support a unified colonial revolt against British rule and the colonies would not have become independent, in which case, all else remaining the same, slavery in Britain's American colonies would have been legally abolished thirty years prior to its being abolished in what had become the United States of America: Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
@Moki; Good point....
Welcome toOur Salon
Posted by Boanerges on January 20, 2019 at 4:09pm
Posted by koshersalaami on January 20, 2019 at 1:59pm
Posted by Robert Young on January 20, 2019 at 12:00pm
Posted by J.P. Hart on January 20, 2019 at 9:58am
Posted by Robert B. James on January 20, 2019 at 8:30am
Posted by Ron Powell on January 20, 2019 at 8:00am
Posted by koshersalaami on January 20, 2019 at 7:23am
Posted by Johnny Robish on January 19, 2019 at 10:15pm
Posted by Doc Vega on January 19, 2019 at 1:30pm
Posted by Robert B. James on January 19, 2019 at 8:30am
Posted by Johnny Robish on January 18, 2019 at 9:28pm
Posted by Ron Powell on January 18, 2019 at 6:30pm
Posted by Doc Vega on January 18, 2019 at 2:00pm
Posted by Dicky Neely on January 18, 2019 at 1:01pm
Posted by mary gravitt on January 18, 2019 at 12:56pm
© 2019 Created by lorianne.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.