What might the outcome have been had these people chosen anonymity and submitted this document unsigned?
First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few.
Secondly, what amazes me is that most of the same people that want to burn Snowden, Manning and Assuage at the stake for public disclosure of even less damaging things that were embarrassing to a Democratic administration are perfectly okay with the "person" who wrote the op-ed staying anonymous because it harms a Republican administration. Makes a person want to yell, "Insanely partisan, much?".
Snowden, Manning, and Assange are not equivalent to each other. Presenting Obama and Trump as equivalent shows an almost nonexistent understanding of the Presidency.
As I said elsewhere today: If Deep Throat had resigned, Nixon would have served out his second term. That’s a much closer parallel than the Declaration.
Nice red herring you tossed out there, KB. Planning on serving it for dinner after it stops flip flopping?
None of what was written in the Washington Post was attributed to Deep Throat contemporaneously. He was an anonymous source not an anonymous author...Huge difference transactiinally and functionally.
Re the Declaration and this recent anonymoust NYT OP-ED:
It's not about the documents per se regarding a parallel or equivalency...It's about courage of conviction and 'owning it'.
Amy; "First of all, those "guys" are factually anonymous to 95% of Americans. Even if you read them their names they would only know a few."
"Those guys", as you call them, were not unknown to the Americans of their day, and many we're known to King George III...
Again it was about courage of conviction and "owning it" as you might say..
On the other hand:
Perhaps a unanimously anonymous document could not have been used to support a unified colonial revolt against British rule and the colonies would not have become independent, in which case, all else remaining the same, slavery in Britain's American colonies would have been legally abolished thirty years prior to its being abolished in what had become the United States of America: Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
@Moki; Good point....
Join Our Salon
Welcome toOur Salon
Sign Upor Sign In
Posted by Doc Vega on April 24, 2019 at 1:03pm
Posted by Robert B. James on April 24, 2019 at 8:19am
Posted by Johnny Robish on April 23, 2019 at 7:30pm
Posted by mary gravitt on April 23, 2019 at 11:13am
Posted by John Manchester on April 23, 2019 at 10:08am
Posted by J.P. Hart on April 23, 2019 at 9:17am
Posted by Robert B. James on April 23, 2019 at 7:36am
Posted by Chuck Priest on April 23, 2019 at 5:30am
Posted by Johnny Robish on April 22, 2019 at 9:39pm
Posted by Jonathan Wolfman on April 22, 2019 at 12:04pm
Posted by Anna Herrington on April 22, 2019 at 10:30am
Posted by Doc Vega on April 22, 2019 at 7:30am
Posted by Robert B. James on April 22, 2019 at 7:26am
Posted by Rodney Roe on April 22, 2019 at 6:53am
Posted by Chuck Priest on April 22, 2019 at 5:00am
© 2019 Created by lorianne.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.