Sometimes, you cannot believe what you read in the papers or see on TV.  I'll admit that I was as fooled as anyone once I got wind of Donald Trump's aircraft carrier move to just off the Korean Peninsula.

You have to admit,  the word "frightening" isn't even close to what the press accounts have been talking about. President T-Rex has stated that he is considering a first strike on the DPRK if it proceeds with its nuclear weapons test, scheduled for May 15th.  For one thing, an American strike on either North Korean nuclear facilities or on Kim Jong Un personally would almost certainly unleash those 16,000 pieces of heavy artillery that have been pre-aimed at various locations around Seoul, South Korea. It might take less than 30 seconds for a command to be given to simultaneously load and fire those guns, and it's been estimated that millions of South Koreans would die as a result.

Of course, Trump could consider a first strike on those artillery pieces; but it would require a string of tactical nuclear weapons to do so.  Besides being a crime against humanity, this would no doubt arouse the ire of both China and Russia.  World War III would not be out of the picture under these circumstances.  

However, the Chinese could peacefully retaliate by suddenly unloading $500 billion worth of US Treasuries on the world market.  Interest rates in the US would immediately go up to say, 15% overnight.  The whole world economy would have a heart attack, and collateral damage could be the death of the euro.  So Great Depression II is another scenario here.

The obvious reaction is that the Orange Wonder is our answer to Caligula. That is no doubt a reasonable reaction. And the conventional media, while often disparaging the Conman in Chief, also has nothing but nice things to say about Generals Mattis and McMaster, both of whom are seen as the adults in the kindergarten that is the White House.  So the whole world is trying not to froth too much at the mouth over the mystifying and incredibly risky and dangerous policies that #45 is following.

But think about this for a moment.  Didn't Donny run on a polciy of non-intervention?  Wasn't Hillary Clinton the dangerous warmonger for suggesting that the US should immediately get more deeply involved in Syria, for example?  And don't you find it slightly amazing that the First Liar did a 180 on Korea -- becoming a little Teddy Roosevelt? How many times in American history has a president totally reversed himself on the issue of peace versus war?

When I began to think about these things, I began to smell a rat. Donald Trump's natural impulses would not be to pay too much attention to the DPRK. I mean, how much did he talk about North Korea on the campaign? And then he suddenly totally flips and reverses!

Being out of the US, I'm sure you hear a lot more of the propaganda than I do.  Kim Jong Un is intensifying his missle testing and atom bomb building programs.  Some day soon, he might have the capability to have an ICBM.  And some day, he might have the capability of putting a miniaturized atomic weapon on one  missle.  Or perhaps he will have the equivalent of an American Polaris missle on a submarine.  And all of this is an existential threat to the United States.  Give me a break! Given Kim Jong Un's current military capabilities, the best way for him to deliver a nuclear weapon to the USA would be by Fed Ex.

So just what is happening here?  For one thing, it would appear that the Trumpster had swallowed US Defense Department propaganda lock, stock, and barrel.  His newly found fixation on showing the North Koreans must be traced back to Generals McMasters and Mattis (the so-called adults in the room). I contend that the generals are the ones who put Donny up to this. They've had their plans on file for some time now, and they've sensed weakness in the DPRK leadership. The reality is -- Trump is a chump, a fool easily led by the sweet words that the national security apparatus has put in his ears.

And here is where I thought of a similar circumstance.  In 1999, President Clinton took an extremely dangerous position on Yugoslavia, almost daring Russia to declare war on us for our intervention in that splintered country.  Not many people know this, but Clinton avoided World War III at 2AM on August 9th, 1999 when he got out of bed and ordered Gen. Wes Clark to stand down from his position as NATO commander.  Clark had ordered NATO troops to "meet" i.e. possibly militarily engage with Russian troops at the Pristina, Yugoslavia airbase.  Yes, we did come that close to being radioactive carbon.

Now think about this. Doesn't the current situation for North Korea sound remarkably familiar to our warmongering position for Yugoslavia?  To me, the answer is indisputably, "YES!" And if there is going to be a peaceful outcome to the current crisis, it will have to follow the Yugoslavian road map.

Leftists complain about our heinous lust for ill-begotten military adventure.  Right wing conservatives are enraged at Trump's broken promises to concentrate on America first instead of engaging in ruinous miitary adventures. But the reality is, the constellation of defense contractors, neocons, and Wall Street consistently push for foolhardy and expansionistic military involvement for their own self-interest.

Barack Obama called this foreign and military conglomeration The Blob, as in that old 1950s horror movie.  Sometimes invisible, but nevertheless always present, The Blob can spring out of nowhere -- swallowing and engulfing any country that does not want to play by multinational rules 100%. How many countries has the US Government overthrown, and for what reason were they overthrown?  Libya, Syria, and Iraq are but three examples of many.

Oftentimes, The Blob will decide to intervene in a country when it senses weakness, and then it will strike. It doesn't take much to make up some cheesy propaganda about  how nerve gas or nuclear weapon will be delivered to New York City  by some guy on a camel (or some other ridiculous story).  War fever and patriotism can be quickly ginned up, and to hell with the consequences.

Now going back to our 1999 example, once the war scare passed, it was easy to get all parties to the negotiating table, and some sense of stability could be worked out.  I believe that this time is different, in that President Drumpf just met with Chinese Prime Minister Xi Jing Ping.  I believe that China is playing along with the US on this one.  News reports say that 150,000 Chinese troops have beem massed on the North Korean border, and China has turned back shipments of North Korean coal.

All of this suggests to me that China will play the good cop on this caper, and we already know who will be the bad cop.  After this major war scare passes, the playbook is that all parties can return to the negotiating table and work out some new relation between North Korea and everyone else. If this is true, this indicates that in many respects China may actually be more of a partner in international affairs with the US in future capers.

Mind you, the United States is making things extremely difficult -- saying that it will only accept talks if the DPRK gives up its nuclear capabiility.  Under the current circumstances, this might seem almost impossible. But what if Pyongyang were able to end the Korean War, and recieve full diplomatic relations from the US and others? That might be incentive enough for Kim Jong Un to consider.

As it is now, the situation is analogous to a SWAT team surrounding the house where there's a man with a gun. The SWAT team has a series of plans and techniques to allow the man with the gun to eventually peacefully surrender.  Nine times out of ten, SWAT plans actually do defuse a bad situation.

The only problem comes if someone on the SWAT team makes a mistake, or if the man inside the house does something rash. In that case, something terrible will happen.

The problem with this analogy is that an accident with Pyongyang could result in either nuclear war or economic catastrophe. The world is waiting -- holding its breath.

Views: 135

Comment by old new lefty on April 16, 2017 at 10:28am

JMAC, my bet is on a directed energy weapon aimed at the missle by the US Navy.

Comment by moki ikom on April 16, 2017 at 2:19pm

from http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2017/0307/Why-North-Korea-wants-a-nuclear-weapon :

‘“ (when) North Korea fired four ballistic missiles into the waters off Japan, (some terrorUSt experts) claim dry run of nuclear attack against US military bases there. But experts say this exercise was defensive, not offensive.  …

“When you look at their actions and their words, the North Koreans’ goals for their nuclear program are first of all to deter America from invading them,” says Joshua Pollack, editor of The Nonproliferation Review. “Their basic strategy is when massive American reinforcements show up in the region to launch the invasion, the North Koreans are going to bring out their big guns to stop that from happening.”

This attitude is the result of years of bad blood between it and the US. North Korea’s interest in a nuclear weapon started after World War II. Eight years later, the Korean War ended not with a peace agreement, but with an armistice, technically keeping the Korean Peninsula in a state of war until this day. During the cold war, North Korea aligned with the Soviet Union and communist China, putting it at odds with the US. And in his 2002 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush lumped North Korea into the “axis of evil,” countries he said were involved with terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. “‘

Not US terrorists, us terrorUSts, US Americans (not at all to mean an abbreviation of or conflation with all  us U.S. Americans), our terrorUSt propaganda has most of us reacting like msnbc’s Brian Wiliams where we see our weapons as things of beauty, not as weapons of mass destruction.  For instance,  I’ve yet to hear one mainstream talking head refer to our current “Mother of All Bombs” as a ‘weapon of mass destruction’ or that anything terrorUSts do is terrorizing yet without saying the word terror that is exactly what our militarist terrorUSts and their advocates infer is the main objective of their latest 59 missiles attack on Syria, their MOAB use in Afghanistan and stationing a nuclear armed armada next to Korea. 

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon

NEW BLOG POSTS

How Far We've Fallen

Posted by cheshyre on September 19, 2017 at 7:47pm 2 Comments

Burn Out

Posted by cheshyre on September 19, 2017 at 2:24am 1 Comment

Retirement Life; What's It All About?

Posted by Rodney Roe on September 18, 2017 at 12:02pm 13 Comments

Where Have Oli Garchs Gone?

Posted by Robert Young on September 18, 2017 at 8:00am 4 Comments

Health-Care: Privilege v Right?

Posted by Ron Powell on September 18, 2017 at 4:00am 16 Comments

need

Posted by Michelle Mellette on September 18, 2017 at 4:00am 0 Comments

Does Anyone Know any Active Masons?

Posted by Terry McKenna on September 17, 2017 at 2:00pm 4 Comments

© 2017   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service