THE RED FLAG PRESENTS: DONALD TRUMP & AMERICAN AUSCHWITZES

Politics

What Is Steve Bannon And Jeff Sessions' Shared Vision For Remaking America?

43:09

Journalist Emily Bazelon says the relationship between Bannon and Sessions predates the 2016 campaign, and that their anti-immigration policies come from fears of a growing minority population. http://www.npr.org/2017/03/09/519415023/what-is-steve-bannon-and-je...

Laurence Lafore in The End of Glory (1970) posits that the Second World War seemed, when it was breaking out and being fought, to be so much Adolf Hitler's war that it became difficult for later observers to recognize that Hitler himself was an expression of something basically wrong with the articulation of political power in the world.  When the old system was working more vigorously--although never better than imperfectly-- before 1914, Hitler would simply not have been permitted.

This basically can be said of Donald Trump ascension to the Presidency.  If it were not for the breakdown of Neoliberalism/Globalism, a man with the character flaws of a Donald Trump could have never been elected president.  Prior to 1978, he would simply not have been permitted.

David C. Korten in The Great Turning (2006) would attribute Trump's election to Americans not "confronting our national shadow."  Korten states that in Jungian psychoanalysis, the term "shadow" refers to aspects of the self that have been denied and relegated to the unconscious mind as threats to the conscious mind's preferred self-image.  It includes not only negative qualities but also positive potentials the conscious mind finds too unnerving to accept.

It is much the same for nations.  This is a time of sorrow and denial for the United States.  We suffer from the considerable gap between our idealized self-image as a democratic, peace-loving nation and the reality of our history of genocide, slavery, discrimination, exploitation of working people, and imperial expansion.  The denial of our national shadow comes at a heavy price, for we cannot correct disabilities we deny.  An essential mark of maturity in both individuals and nations is the capacity to acknowledge and address all the dimensions of one's character, both positive and negative.  To become the people and the nation of our ideals, we must find the wisdom and the courage to collectively acknowledge and learn from our past transgressions and to engage in a process of national and global healing and reconciliation.

Those who dismiss such critical examination as an act of disloyalty, even treason, reveal that they have yet to develop the emotional maturity to acknowledge the shadow of our national experience and to assume the full responsibilities of democratic citizenship, which requires a capacity for critical self-examination, both individually and nationally.

Likewise, in the name of border protection (terrorists arrived in airports) our local police have been organized into Trump's SS Einsatzgruppen to round-up so-called illegals, which is a farce since people cannot be illegal--undocumented, but not illegal.

David C. Korten in The Great Turning (2006) would attribute Trump's election to Americans not "confronting our national shadow."  Korten states that in Jungian psychoanalysis, the term "shadow" refers to aspects of the self that have been denied and relegated to the unconscious mind as threats to the conscious mind's preferred self-image.  It includes not only negative qualities but also positive potentials the conscious mind finds too unnerving to accept.

It is much the same for nations.  This is a time of sorrow and denial for the United States.  We suffer from the considerable gap between our idealized self-image as a democratic, peace-loving nation and the reality of our history of genocide, slavery, discrimination, exploitation of working people, and imperial expansion.  The denial of our national shadow comes at a heavy price, for we cannot correct disabilities we deny.  An essential mark of maturity in both individuals and nations is the capacity to acknowledge and address all the dimensions of one's character, both positive and negative.  To become the people and the nation of our ideals, we must find the wisdom and the courage to collectively acknowledge and learn from our past transgressions and to engage in a process of national and global healing and reconciliation.

Those who dismiss such critical examination as an act of disloyalty, even treason, reveal that they have yet to develop the emotional maturity to acknowledge the shadow of our national experience and to assume the full responsibilities of democratic citizenship, which requires a capacity for critical self-examination, both individually and nationally.

Likewise, in the name of border protection (terrorists arrived in airports) our local police have been organized into Trump's SS Einsatzgruppen to round-up so-called illegals, which is a farce since people cannot be illegal--undocumented, but not illegal.

AMERICAN AUSCHWITZES

The inmates of American-style Auschwitz facilities will soon contain women separated from their children as a punishment for entering the US illegally.  This involuntary separation (kidnapping) is the idea of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly.  The Wannsee has been held--he stands in the place of Dr. Mengele of Auschwitz, of whom Konrad H. Jarausch writes in Out Of Ashes conducted almost fifteen hundred twin experiments on Romani (Gypsy) children, injecting them with dyes to change their eye color, sewing them together, and so on.  Since the results of were reported in journals, the professional leadership was complicit in such science run amok.

Similar to laws run-amok in Trump's America.

This segregation, Kelly declares is for the good of the American public and illegal immigrants in tandem teaching them morality.  He’s taking moral-cues from a memo that Nicholson Baker in Human Smoke (2008) says President Franklin Roosevelt wrote to Samuel Fuller.  Roosevelt asked Fuller who was to visit Berlin in May 1933 to find answers to some questions about Hitler.  One questions was: "Is he going to keep the Jews out for good?  Or is he just punishing them temporarily to make them be good?"

"Regarding the Jews," wrote Fuller to Roosevelt, "Dr. Schacht stated that the Jewish situation had been much exaggerated in the American press."

From Refugees To Politics, Mohsin Hamid Writes The Change He Wants To See

36:16

March 8, 20172:00 PM ET

Exit West
Exit West

by Mohsin Hamid

Hardcover, 240 pages

Author Mohsin Hamid's new novel, Exit West, is about knowing when it's time to flee your country, and what happens when you migrate to a nation that's hostile to immigrants. It's a topic the author himself is personally familiar with.

Hamid was born in Lahore, Pakistan, but spent part of his childhood in California. As a young adult, he lived in New York and London before returning to Lahore with his wife to raise their children. He tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross that moving from country to country initially made him feel like "kind of freak," but as he got older, his outlook changed.

"I became more and more comfortable just being myself, a kind of mongrelized, hybridized, weird sort of character," Hamid says. "What I started to realize was everybody feels a bit foreign ... even people who have lived in the same place."

Exit West is about a young couple who have to decide whether to leave their home in an unnamed city that is slowly being overtaken by militants. Hamid says it's just a coincidence that the book was published shortly after President Trump announced his revised travel ban. He says that while his novel doesn't explicitly address the ban, the themes it raises — about who belongs and who doesn't — are directly related to the ban.



"Above all, [the travel ban is] about who has the right to move and who doesn't have the right to move," he says. "I think that when we take the long view, the notion that some people are deemed less worthy of being able to move — to not have the right to cross borders — over time that's going to seem as outmoded and as unfair, really, as racial discrimination or other kinds of discrimination."


Mohsin Hamid's previous novels include The Reluctant Fundamentalist and How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia.

Jillian Edelstein/Camera Press

Interview Highlights

On how Trump's policies are being received outside the U.S. and the fear that they may fuel radicalization

Outside of America there are many people, myself included, who champion values that in some senses could be thought of as traditionally American: The idea that everybody is equal; the idea that the rights of women and men should be the same; that there should be no discrimination [based] on religious or sexual orientation; that democracy and rule of law and due process are the ways in which society should govern themselves; and minorities should be cared for.

These, in a way, are values that America has championed internationally. Not exclusively, of course — America has a mixed history. But I think for many people around the world, the sense is they've lost an ally, that this very powerful force that used to speak for these things is now silent. That's different [from] radicalization, but certainly it's about undermining fellow travelers.

At the same time, I think radicalization works in a slightly different way. When people — particularly young people and especially young men — can't imagine themselves as heroes in narratives that they construct for themselves, they look to be heroes in some other way. So young men in America of, let's say, Muslim background: Only a tiny, tiny minority — so small as to be almost zero — are likely to ever commit terrorist acts, but what goes through the mind of somebody like that? ... In a sense, by closing off the idea that young Muslims, and particularly young Muslim men, can be American heroes, it increases the chance that they'll try to be some other kind of hero. And that, I think, is entirely counterproductive.

On whether he feels limited in what he can and can't write living in Pakistan, which has Blasphemy Laws that call for the death penalty for anyone convicted of insulting the Prophet Muhammad

It's not that living in Pakistan I feel an enormous constraint on how I can write and what I can say; rather, I recognize that one has to navigate these things. ... Am I aware of things that one could say that would be risky or that could be dangerous? Certainly I'm aware of those things. And then being aware you make certain choices. Sometimes you'll say something; sometimes you'll find a different way of saying something. And many things might be risky to say, but you have no desire to say them because they don't reflect what you believe.

Language is a living thing, stories are a living thing — they shape our societies.

But all of it connects to say that language is a living thing, stories are a living thing — they shape our societies. People will be passionate about what you write, and that is not so much a discouragement, but a reminder that what we're doing isn't pointless, that all of us who are writers are doing something that actually matters.

On the anxiety that can come from following the constant stream of news and social media

This is something that living in Pakistan perhaps has taught me. We live in a world where there is a constant feed from social media, the news, etc., of things that can scare us, and we become so anxious because human beings are designed to be sensitized to dangerous stuff. ... Contemporary culture in Pakistan, just like in America, is continuously hitting us with scary stuff, and so we are utterly anxious.

I think that it's very important to resist that anxiety, to think of ways of resisting the constant inflow of negative feelings — not to become depoliticized as a result, but to actually work actively to bring into being an optimistic future. For me, writing books and being someone who is politically active is part of that. I don't want to be anxious in my day-to-day life; I want to try to imagine a future I'd like to live in and then write books and do things that, in my own small way, make it more likely that that future will come to exist. http://www.npr.org/2017/03/08/519217991/from-refugees-to-politics-m...

Views: 32

Comment by Jonathan Wolfman on March 13, 2017 at 7:59am

at some oint people will need to decide if they can actively resist, beyond the rhetorical

Comment by mary gravitt on March 15, 2017 at 10:02am

Americans has long stopped resisting because they believe that WE are at the end of history.  We don't need clean air and water, and we don't need fuel efficient cars because we have the best military and can neglect the domestic and go out and kill them for theirs.  I hope this makes sense.

Comment

You need to be a member of Our Salon to add comments!

Join Our Salon

NEW BLOG POSTS

EX-freakin'-ACTLY!

Posted by Safe Bet's Amy on November 18, 2017 at 8:20am 25 Comments

Killing the Party and the Mascot Too

Posted by Ron Powell on November 17, 2017 at 6:30pm 14 Comments

Sex Sells But Follow The Money

Posted by Ron Powell on November 17, 2017 at 11:30am 5 Comments

Vanity of youManity

Posted by moki ikom on November 17, 2017 at 10:00am 3 Comments

What would YOU ask Roy??

Posted by cheshyre on November 16, 2017 at 9:03pm 12 Comments

Weird Al

Posted by Robert Young on November 16, 2017 at 8:30pm 41 Comments

© 2017   Created by lorianne.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service